Claimocity Claims
What's Changing in MIPS for 2026?
Your Complete Guide
Another year, another round of Medicare regulation updates. The CMS Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule for 2025 brings significant changes to MIPS (Merit-based Incentive Payment System) that will affect your 2026 performance year and your 2028 Medicare reimbursements. Whether these changes boost or reduce your payments depends on how well you prepare now.
MIPS adjustments can mean up to a 9% swing in your Medicare reimbursements, positive or negative. Understanding what’s changing and taking strategic action puts you in control. This guide breaks down the 2026 MIPS updates by category, explains what they mean for your practice, and gives you a clear action plan for compliance.
MIPS Basics: What You Need to Know
MIPS is Medicare’s performance-based payment system that adjusts your reimbursements based on how well you meet specific quality, cost, and technology benchmarks. Think of it as Medicare’s report card for your practice. Your score determines whether you receive payment bonuses, penalties, or stay neutral.
The program measures performance across four categories:
- Quality: How well you meet clinical care standards (30% of your score)
- Cost: Your efficiency in delivering care relative to episode-based benchmarks (30% of your score)
- Improvement Activities: Your participation in care improvement initiatives (15% of your score)
- Promoting Interoperability: Your use of certified EHR technology to improve care coordination (25% of your score)
CMS updates the requirements annually to reflect evolving healthcare priorities.
Why the 2026 Changes Matter
The 2026 performance year brings adjustments to measure specifications, scoring methodologies, and reporting options. CMS continues pushing toward outcomes-based measurements, which sounds great in theory but means your documentation needs to be more precise than ever.
For inpatient providers, these changes affect everything from which quality measures you should select to how your cost performance gets calculated. Wait until mid-2026 to figure this out, and you’ll spend the rest of the year playing catch-up. Your 2026 performance determines your 2028 reimbursements, so what you do now has a delayed but very real financial impact.
The performance period runs all of 2026, so any workflow or documentation changes you need to make should happen before January. Waiting until mid-year to address these updates leaves little room to course-correct if your initial approach isn’t working.
2026 Changes Breakdown: What's New in Each Category
Quality
Quality and Cost now share equal weight at 30% each of your total MIPS score, making both categories critical to your overall performance. CMS has updated quality measure specifications to better align with current clinical guidelines and has retired measures that either topped out (everyone scored high) or showed poor discrimination between good and mediocre performance.
Several new measures focusing on health equity and patient-reported outcomes have been added. The benchmark system has also been recalibrated using more recent performance data, so measures that felt easy to max out last year may now have higher thresholds. On the flip side, some previously challenging measures may offer better scoring opportunities under the new benchmarks.
Review your current measure selections now. If you’ve been reporting the same six measures for the past three years, check whether their specifications changed. New documentation requirements or calculation methodologies can trip you up if you discover them in October instead of January. You may need to swap out measures that no longer align with your patient population or clinical workflows.
Cost
Cost performance accounts for 30% of your total score, equal to Quality. CMS has refined how they calculate cost measures, with adjustments to risk adjustment methodologies and episode definitions. Several episode-based cost measures specific to inpatient settings have been introduced, while others have been retired.
The updated risk adjustment methodology means your cost performance gets compared more fairly against practices with similar patient complexity. However, this only works if your documentation actually captures that complexity. If you’re treating medically complicated patients but your notes don’t reflect their complications and comorbidities, you’ll look expensive relative to your benchmark.
Track your episode-based costs throughout the year rather than waiting until submission. When you review costs quarterly, you can identify outliers and figure out whether they represent documentation gaps, actual inefficiencies, or legitimate variations in patient complexity. Waiting until December to look at your cost data leaves no time to address systematic issues.
Improvement Activities
Improvement Activities account for 15% of your score and offer the most flexibility in how you demonstrate compliance. CMS has added new activities focused on health equity, care coordination for complex patients, and population health management. Some activities have been consolidated or removed due to overlap or low participation rates.
The scoring structure hasn’t changed. Complete two high-weighted activities or four medium-weighted activities for full credit. The key is selecting activities that align with work you’re already doing. Many practices overcomplicate this category by choosing activities that require entirely new workflows.
Look for activities that recognize quality improvement initiatives, care coordination processes, or population health work already happening in your practice. If you’re participating in a registry for quality reporting, that often qualifies as an improvement activity. If you’re already conducting medication reconciliation at transitions of care, document it properly and claim credit. Don’t create extra work just to check a MIPS box.
Promoting Interoperability
Promoting Interoperability makes up 25% of your score and focuses on how you use your EHR for care coordination. CMS has updated several measure specifications to reflect advances in health information exchange technology, with increased emphasis on bidirectional exchange and patient access to health information through APIs and patient portals.
Several measures now require specific 2015 Edition CEHRT (Certified Electronic Health Record Technology) functionalities. If your EHR vendor hasn’t pushed recent updates, you may be missing required capabilities. The security risk analysis requirement remains, and CMS has clarified what constitutes an acceptable analysis. Health information exchange measures now emphasize the quality of information exchanged, not just volume.
Verify early that your EHR is configured to capture required data elements for each measure. Practices frequently discover in November that their system wasn’t tracking certain activities all year, making retrospective reporting impossible. Test your reporting capabilities in January or February, not December. If something isn’t working, you’ll have time to fix it or switch to a different measure.
Mark Your Calendar: Critical MIPS Deadlines for 2026
Timing determines whether you’re prepared or scrambling. Here’s what you need to know about the 2026 performance period.
Performance Period: January 1, 2026 through December 31, 2026. Every patient encounter during this full year counts toward your score across all four categories.
Submission Deadline: Data must be submitted by early 2027 (CMS typically announces the exact date in late 2026). Waiting until the deadline is risky. Technology issues, data validation problems, or last-minute discoveries of missing information can derail your submission entirely.
Quarterly Checkpoints to Keep Yourself on Track:
Q1: Finalize which measures you’re reporting and confirm your submission method (registry, EHR, direct). Make sure your EHR is configured to capture everything you need.
Q2: Run a mid-year performance check. Pull reports on your selected measures and identify any documentation gaps or workflow issues affecting your data capture.
Q3: Start preparing your submission data. Resolve any documentation problems while you still have time to improve your performance on struggling measures.
Q4: Complete final data validation and prepare for submission. Address any last data quality issues before the performance period closes.
When to Start Preparing: Before January 2026. Reviewing these changes in December 2025 and adjusting your approach before the performance period starts gives you a full year of clean data. Starting in March means you’ve already lost a quarter of your performance period to suboptimal workflows.
Prepare Your Practice: Action Steps for Compliance
Assess Your Current Performance
Start by understanding where you stand. Pull your most recent MIPS performance feedback report and review your scores across each category.
Compare your scores to the performance thresholds. Are you comfortably above the line, barely meeting requirements, or at risk for penalties? This tells you how much improvement you need and where to focus your efforts.
Look for patterns in underperformance. If you lost points in Quality, was it because of measure selection, incomplete documentation, or workflow issues preventing consistent data capture? If Cost dragged down your score, was it documentation gaps in risk adjustment or actual efficiency problems? Understanding the root cause helps you implement targeted solutions rather than making broad changes that don’t address the actual problem.
Not every category deserves equal attention. If you’re already performing well in Promoting Interoperability and struggling in Quality, focus your improvement efforts on Quality. Going from 80% to 95% in a weak category improves your total score more than going from 95% to 100% in a strong one.
Update Your Documentation Processes
The 2026 measure updates likely mean your current documentation practices won’t capture everything you need for optimal performance.
Map each selected measure to your current workflow. Where do you capture the required data elements? If a quality measure now requires documentation you’re not consistently recording, identify where in the patient encounter that information needs to be added. If cost measures require more detailed comorbidity documentation for proper risk adjustment, determine who’s responsible for capturing that and where it gets documented.
Your entire care team needs to understand how their documentation affects MIPS scores. This isn’t just providers. Nursing staff, medical assistants, and administrative personnel all play roles in capturing complete data. A medical assistant who skips documenting vital signs because “the doctor will get them” has just created a gap in your quality measure data.
Work with your EHR vendor to configure templates, order sets, and decision support tools that make compliant documentation easier. If your system can prompt for required data elements at the point of care, you’re less likely to have missing information later.
Choose Your Reporting Strategy
How you submit MIPS data affects both your administrative burden and your potential score.
Individual vs. group reporting: Individual reporting gives each provider control over their performance but requires more administrative work per provider. Group reporting simplifies submission since you only submit once, but one provider’s poor performance affects everyone’s score. Consider your practice dynamics. If you have a few providers who consistently underperform, individual reporting protects your high performers. If your team performs relatively evenly, group reporting reduces administrative burden.
Submission methods: You can report through your EHR, a qualified registry, a qualified clinical data registry (QCDR), or directly to CMS. Each has different capabilities, costs, and requirements.
EHR reporting works if your system is properly configured and you trust its data quality. Direct submission to CMS gives you complete control but requires more technical knowledge and offers no benchmarking support. Registries often provide benchmark data, performance dashboards, and submission support, but they charge fees for these services.
If you’re using a registry, confirm they support all your selected measures and understand their submission timeline. If reporting directly, make sure your team knows how to use the CMS submission portal. Test it early with sample data rather than learning the system in January 2027 when you’re trying to make the deadline.
Monitor Throughout the Year
MIPS performance isn’t something you check in December. Regular monitoring throughout the performance period catches problems while you can still fix them.
Set up dashboards that show real-time or near-real-time performance on each selected measure. Many EHRs and registries offer this functionality. Review these dashboards monthly at a minimum. If a quality measure you expected to score well on shows only 60% compliance in March, you have nine months to improve it. Discovering that problem in November leaves no meaningful time to recover.
Schedule quarterly MIPS review meetings. Pull your current performance data, identify any workflow issues affecting capture, and make adjustments. This might mean retraining staff on documentation requirements, adjusting EHR templates, or even changing which measures you’re reporting if your initial selections aren’t working.
Don’t be afraid to pivot mid-year. If you selected six quality measures in January but two of them are performing poorly despite your best efforts, switch to different measures while you still have time to build a strong performance record. Submitting excellent performance on four good measures beats submitting mediocre performance on six struggling ones.
Staying Ahead in the MIPS Landscape
MIPS compliance isn’t something you figure out once and forget about. CMS updates the program annually, refining measures, adjusting benchmarks, and introducing new requirements. What works for 2026 won’t necessarily work for 2027. Staying compliant requires ongoing attention to regulatory changes and consistent performance monitoring throughout each year.
The practices that perform well on MIPS build compliance into their routine workflows rather than treating it as a separate project. They track performance in real time, catch documentation gaps early, and adjust their approach when something isn’t working. This consistent attention prevents year-end scrambling and protects against penalties.
Claimocity’s platform integrates MIPS tracking directly into your charge capture workflow, so monitoring compliance becomes part of your daily operation. Our system stays current with regulatory updates, tracks your performance across all four categories, and alerts you to potential issues before they impact your score. When submission time comes, we handle the technical complexity so you can focus on running your practice.
Ready to Simplify Your MIPS Compliance?
MIPS rewards consistency, not last-minute effort. Claimocity solutions keep your performance on track all year, with updates and insights that surface when you need them, not after the fact.
Meet your MIPS requirements without adding hours of admin. Book a demo to get started.
