Claimocity Claims

The Inpatient Guide to Effective Claim Submission

Widely cited data from Kodiak Solutions and Premier, Inc. suggest initial claim denial rates have reached as high as 12-15% in recent years, while this report from IHIMA indicates similar denial rates for hospital and inpatient claims. Roughly 85% to 90% of these denials are avoidable. 

This represents a huge loss of revenue and time. Effective claim submission can be a fairly complex process especially for inpatient care facilities and providers. In this comprehensive guide, we’ll go through the claim submission process, common mistakes, and best practices for improving your organization’s clean claim rates. 

What Is Claim Submission in Medical Billing?

The Crucial Role of Claims in the Revenue Cycle

Step-by-Step Medical Claim Submission Process

Whether or not you use these KPIs as part of a comprehensive revenue cycle audit, it’s important to understand each step of the claim submission process.

1. Patient Registration

First, you’ll collect basic patient demographic information: name, date of birth, address, phone number, and insurance information. You’ll verify that patient records match payer records to prevent eligibility and identity-related denials. If the coverage belongs to a spouse or parent, you’ll need to confirm subscriber information. Errors are commonly committed during patient registration, and they can cause problems downstream during the RCM process.

2. Insurance Verification

During the insurance verification stage, you’ll confirm that the patient’s coverage is active, then verify benefits, copays, deductibles, coinsurance, and network status. This is the time to determine whether the planned service requires a referral or prior authorization, and to confirm that all required authorizations are obtained and documented before claim submission. You’ll update coverage information at every visit, just in case the patient’s policy has changed or expired. Eligibility issues remain a leading cause of claim denials, so it’s particularly crucial to be accurate during this step.

3. Coding (CPT/ICD)

4. Claim Generation

To generate the claim, you’ll compile all the information from the first 3 steps: patient, provider, coding, and charge information. Then you’ll verify that all of the information is complete before submission. When it’s required by payer policies, you’ll need to attach supporting documentation. Once you’ve confirmed that the rendering provider and the billing provider information is accurate, you should be ready to submit the claim.

5. Claim Submission

Claims are normally submitted electronically through a clearinghouse or directly to the payer. This is where the benefits of claim scrubbing become apparent. It’s a pre-submission review process that identifies missing data, coding conflicts, modifier issues, and payer rule violations. Automated claim validation helps reduce preventable errors before claims reach the payer.

6. Payer Review

Payers don’t miss a thing. They evaluate eligibility, coverage, coding, medical necessity, authorization status, and policy compliance. In fact, nowadays, it’s more likely that a payers’ AI tool is overreporting claim submission errors. Not only do payer rules vary from company to company, but they can also vary between plans within the same organization.

7. Adjudication, Payment, or Denial

Payer adjudication is the review process that payers use to evaluate submitted claims. It determines the validity of the claim and calculates exactly how much the payer, provider, and patient are financially responsible for.

There are four possible outcomes: 

  • Approved and paid
  • Partially paid
  • Denied
  • Returned for additional information
 

Payment details are communicated through remittance advice and EOB documentation. It’s important to address denials and underpayments as quickly as possible.

Common Errors That Lead to Claim Denials

There are many different errors that can trigger a denial, and they can occur during almost any step of the RCM process:

Patient & Insurance Information Errors

  • Incorrect patient demographics
  • Eligibility verification failures
  • Missing required claim fields
 

These front-end errors often occur before coding or billing begins. They are some of the most easily prevented causes of claim denial.

Authorization & Documentation Issues

  • Missing or expired prior authorizations
  • Lack of documentation supporting medical necessity
  • Authorization obtained for one procedure but not an additional service
 

Even when coding is correct, insufficient documentation or authorization can stop or delay reimbursement.

Coding & Submission Errors

What’s Different about Submitting Inpatient Claims?

Everything covered so far applies to inpatient claims too, but inpatient care adds several layers of complexity that outpatient and office-based billing don’t have to deal with. A single hospital stay can generate claims from the facility and from every physician who treated the patient, and each of those claims runs on its own rules for medical necessity, coding, and timing.

Two Claim Types, One Encounter

Inpatient care is billed through two separate claim streams that have to tell a consistent story about the same stay. The facility submits an institutional claim (the UB-04, or its electronic equivalent, the 837I) using revenue codes and ICD-10-PCS procedure codes, and it’s reimbursed under the MS-DRG system. Physicians and other providers bill their own services separately, using standard CPT and ICD-10-CM codes much like they would for an office visit. Payers process these two claim types independently, but documentation gaps or coding choices on one side often surface as denials on the other.

Medical Necessity Covers the Admission Itself

Outpatient claims mainly need to justify why a service was performed. Inpatient claims also have to justify the admission: that the patient needed inpatient-level care rather than observation or outpatient treatment. Payers lean on criteria like the Two-Midnight Rule and screening tools such as InterQual or MCG to make that call, and case management or utilization review teams are often involved while the patient is still admitted. Getting the admission status wrong is one of the most common reasons an otherwise clean inpatient claim gets denied or downgraded to observation after the fact.

Authorization Doesn't End at Admission

A single prior authorization at the time of admission usually isn’t the end of it. Longer stays are often subject to concurrent or continued-stay reviews, where the payer periodically checks updated clinical documentation to confirm the patient still meets criteria for inpatient care. Missing one of these reviews, or failing to submit updated notes, can result in a partial denial for the unsupported days, even when the earlier part of the stay was approved.

Coding Runs by the Day and by the Provider

Physicians rounding on inpatients use a different set of E/M codes for initial hospital care, subsequent hospital care, and discharge day management. When an attending physician and consulting specialists are billing for the same patient on the same day, the documentation needs to clearly support each provider’s distinct role so the claims aren’t flagged as duplicate services. On the facility side, coders also have to apply present-on-admission indicators and select an accurate principal diagnosis.

Best Practices for Successful Claim Submission

There is an art to improving your clean claim rate. Here is a list of steps that are crucial for optimizing this critical KPI. 

  • Establish standardized registration and eligibility verification workflows.
  • Verify insurance coverage before every patient encounter.
  • Perform routine coding audits to identify recurring issues.
  • Implement automated claim scrubbing tools to identify errors before submission.
  • Monitor payer updates and policy changes regularly.
  • Obtain prior authorizations whenever required.
  • Submit claims promptly to avoid timely filing issues.
  • Track denial trends to identify root causes and process gaps.
  • Maintain complete, accurate clinical documentation.
  • Leverage reporting and analytics tools to continuously improve claim performance.
  • Train staff regularly on coding, payer requirements, and compliance updates.
  • Use AI medical billing software and RCM services to reduce manual work and improve accuracy.
  • Use mobile charge capture so physicians confirm billable services while the patient encounter is still fresh.
 

Significant revenue loss isn’t normally caused by one or two large, expensive errors. More often, it’s a pattern of small mistakes that can only be detected by carefully monitoring your analytics tools. Learn more about how to streamline denial management with AI.

Get Started with Cleaner Claims

Related Posts

Prioritize Yourself by Choosing Claimocity

Ease your provider experience with us.